Author Topic: Torjunta-aineiden välttelyn haitat  (Read 2413 times)

Heikki Jokipii

  • Ylläpitäjä
  • *****
  • Posts: 13586
    • View Profile
    • Email
Vs: Torjunta-aineiden välttelyn haitat
« Reply #45 on: 23.03.20 - klo:05:20 »
Syytös rikkaalle maailmalle:

The real reasons Africa has another locust plague

Quote
When it comes to insect control, the driving force is aid money totally skewed to agro-ecology and its perverse focus on “food sovereignty,” and “traditional subsistence farming” with wood plows and oxen, “in harmony with nature,” free from Western seeds, fertilizers, tractors and, above all, pesticides.

The new moniker is clever, but the ideology and donor-driven attitudes are nothing new. Dr. Edwards documented them in his 1988 article. The FAO, USAID, USEPA, World Bank, Environmental Defense Fund and other organizations were pushing “all-natural, biological, integrated pest management” practices back then, too. They were totally opposed to the use of dieldrin and other insecticides that actually work. They keep families, communities, clinics and hospitals dependent on minimalist wind and solar electricity.


Mukana konkreettinen ehdotus:

Quote
However, there could still be hope. A single Lockheed KC-130 Hercules tanker plane equipped with Modular Aerial Spray Systems can cover up to 150,000 acres a day. Each plane can carry 2,000 gallons of the most appropriate pesticide-water mixture. The benefits would be immediate and tremendous.

President Trump could order the Air Force to provide a KC-130 or two and enough fenitrothion, Lorsban or other effective insecticide for a few weeks of locust-eradication spraying. He could save millions of lives – and help change attitudes, policies and practices across Africa and the world.


Ja lisäehdotus:

Quote
The President could also order his US Agency for International Development (USAID), State Department and other agencies to end their funding of climate and agro-ecology programs, and start making the East Africa Desert Locust Control Organization the forward-thinking, effective operation it was meant to be.

He could have blunt discussions with the heads of EU nations about their agro-ecology, anti-pesticide and anti-biotechnology policies, funding practices and import restrictions toward Africa – which are an undeniable crime against humanity. Finally, he could direct the Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service to review (and terminate) the tax-exempt status of organizations and foundations engaged in lethal, eco-imperialistic lies and pressure campaigns in Africa, Asia and South America.


« Last Edit: 23.03.20 - klo:05:32 by Heikki Jokipii »

Heikki Jokipii

  • Ylläpitäjä
  • *****
  • Posts: 13586
    • View Profile
    • Email
Vs: Torjunta-aineiden välttelyn haitat
« Reply #46 on: 24.03.20 - klo:10:50 »
Otti Driessen (yllä edellä) esille tämänkin:

Quote
The ChiCom coronavirus and COVID-19 outbreaks, deaths and responses continue to dominate US, European and Asian news. Meanwhile, a very different infestation is devastating East African crops and leaving tens of millions at risk of starvation and death. If COVID hits these weakened populations, amid their malaria and other systemic diseases, it would bring tragedy on unimaginable scales.

Ja niinhän tuo on. Afrikan kuolleet ja meidän kuolleet lasketaan eri tavalla. Voisiko sanoa, että käytetään eri kertoimia.
« Last Edit: 24.03.20 - klo:10:54 by Heikki Jokipii »

Heikki Jokipii

  • Ylläpitäjä
  • *****
  • Posts: 13586
    • View Profile
    • Email
Vs: Torjunta-aineiden välttelyn haitat
« Reply #47 on: 27.03.20 - klo:05:08 »
Tuore paperisena kotiin tullut Kehitys-Utveckling kertoi tästä sirkkatilanteesta yhdellä sivulla. Oli infografiikkaa, aliravittujn määrä maittain.

Sivulle ei ollut mahtunut sanaakaan siitä, mitä asialle voisi tehdä.  8)